Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
4.44/5
Based on 30900 votes and 476 reviews.
Please rate between 1 to 5 stars
June 25, 2004
I think it was the best out of the three even though it was the shortest and it did not follow the book very well. If it was not based on a book it would be considered a great movie one of the best of the year. I wish there was more quidich and the new dumbledore was really bad. They should have got Ian McKellen (Gandalf LOTR)to play as Dumbledore, He would have been able to do a better job at it. They should have keept more to the movie and to the way the first two movies were done it would have made the third movie a much better experience. It still was one of the best movies I have ever seen and I am defently going to see it a couple
June 25, 2004
I love harry potter, but i didn`t like that movie. the book was better and the movies before. i think it was the director of this one. it was so different.
June 24, 2004
ONE Word. AMAZING
June 24, 2004
i thought it was the best movie i have ever seen all 3 of the movies were really really really good but i thought that this one was the best out all of them.and i hope that the 4th is just as good or even better.when i first heard that it was coming out i begged her to take me,and after i saw the movie i was stunned cause i knew it would be good just not that good.i also knew that it would be good because i read the 3rd book twice and it was always my favourite book .god i could go on forever and ever about how good this movie is but i wont.
June 24, 2004
After reading the comments, I have to both agree and disagree. Yes, the Whomping Willow was in a different place. Yes, Dumbledore was not as good as in the previous movies. But I`m afraid the people writing that this movie sucked didn`t look past the flaws. This movie is a wonderful experience with tallented actors, wonderful settings and stayed fairly true to the story. Congrats to the cast and crew of HP3, and boo-hoo to all you dislikers. BlovedhoneyB, age 11.
June 24, 2004
i thought it was great i love harry potter movies thier sometimes funny and its full of action harry potter and the prisoner of azkaban was great.
June 24, 2004
It`s a Big Dissappointment comparing it to the First two movies. The new dumbeldore looks like a hobo or a tramp. Accuracy to the written story was Way! Way! off. The new site for Hagrids cabin, I though was on the edge of a nice lawn not down a bloody mountain goat path. Some your kids in the theater we scarred silly by the were wolf scene. The leaky Caldron is not the way JK writes it. That place looked like a dump. I love the Harry Potter books and most of the characters. Malfoy in this episode goes from one second cursing Hermione to the next blabbering in fear. Anyhow, I was disappointed with the Prisoner of Azkaban movie. I hope the g
June 23, 2004
Okay, one thing. I hated it. I`m a major HP fan, and when I saw the movie I was disgusted. They cut out half of the good scences, and what they left in was different. They added scenes as well, which strayed far from the book. I was constantly explaining what was going on to one of my friends, who hadn`t read the book. Really fake crying by Radcliffe. Dementors DON`T fly. Harry DIDN`T get the Firebolt at the end, but in the middle of the year. Actually, he gotr it a Christmas, not by owl post. The ending was weird also. The werewolf looked totally fake. The whole werewolf scene was not in the book. In other words, they messed up bad.
June 23, 2004
I gotta tell ya, I like the first 2 alot better. This one lacked alot of the magic and feeling of fantasy opposed to the first 2 movies. I still give it a postive review but not as good at 1 and 2. I hope the 4th one really makes up for this one. PS. Lord of the Rings still kicks its butt even though they are totally different. I figure you are either a LOTR or HP fan.
June 23, 2004
I thought that Harry Potter and the prisoner of azkaban was very good and i thought that Gary Oldman played great as Sirius