Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.44/5

User rating: 4.44

Based on 30900 votes and 476 reviews.


  • User rating: 25436 82.82%
  • User rating: 715 2.33%
  • User rating: 356 1.16%
  • User rating: 1092 3.56%
  • User rating: 3115 10.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 191-200 of 476 reviews

User rating: July 6, 2004

movies seriously dont get better than this, anyone thinking about going will watch it 1000 times over, lol every day ts been out ive gone to see t, it was really cool how they had daniel radcliff crying, lol he was spost to e the bravest, ( not like it was his fault he was crying but still ) emma did rally good....

User rating: July 6, 2004

Excellent, i just loved it. Watched already 5 times.

User rating: July 6, 2004

Once i got past the missing plots from the book, I was able to view the movie as a `movie` and not a `book made into a movie`. Upon watching it the second time I found my enjoyment increasing! Special effects were greatly improved from the previous 2 films and the acting was improved upon as well! Note to self...don`t read Goblet of Fire the week before the movie comes out ;)

User rating: July 5, 2004

Wow, I loved it. I can`t wait for the rest of the movies to come out. Although the movie did leave out a lot of stuff from the book but the movie was still great and Daniel Radclif, cute.

User rating: July 5, 2004

I think that the movie was very, very, good. I loved everything about the movie although it wasn`t very accurate to the book. The other director did a better job of directing the movie. The ending of the movie, I thought, was quite sudden and a bit confusing.By the way Emma looked HOT!!!!!!!! Overall I thought the movie was GREAT!

User rating: July 5, 2004

Clearly the book was way better, and the movie was a joke. i keep waiting for someone to yell "Gotcha!! Now here`s the real movie!" I have all the respect in the world for Ms. Rowling, but honestly!!!!! There was just too much wrong, and i think that the directer depended too much on the viewers to have read the books, i know that if i hadn`t read them i would have been lost for some parts. And PS: you can`t change the setting half way through the series!!!! Bring back Chris Columbus to direct. If they screw up #4 the way they did this i might cry!

User rating: July 5, 2004

It was the best movie of the three. I loved it. I can`t wait to see the next Harry Potter movie!

User rating: July 5, 2004

Well, I`ve read all the Harry Potter books, so far, to my son and we`ve seen all the movies, so far, and I must admit I was very, very disappointed in Azkaban. The acting was OK. I think Rupert Grint did the best job of all! However, there were key elements from the novel that were not included in the film. For instance, no mention was made of who created the Marauder`s Map in the movie. This is a very important part of the story. Also the relationship between Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs was not explored enough. The identity of Prongs is very important as it explains why Harry`s Patronus Charm takes the form of a stag. In my

User rating: July 4, 2004

It was awesome and im all ready on the 4th book. im a huge harry potter fan and my brother is an emma watson fan! buckbeak was funny how he looked and the demontors looked so real! it was awesome. keep up da good work.

User rating: June 30, 2004

I LOVED IT!!! it is the best of the three so far! the actors have come soooo far since the first 2! i cant wait til the 4th one comes out! GO HARRY POTTER!!!!!!!