Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.44/5

User rating: 4.44

Based on 30900 votes and 476 reviews.


  • User rating: 25436 82.82%
  • User rating: 715 2.33%
  • User rating: 356 1.16%
  • User rating: 1092 3.56%
  • User rating: 3115 10.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 231-240 of 476 reviews

User rating: June 23, 2004

Disappointing. This is the most disappointing film of the year. In no way does it follow along with what is in the book. The book was scary, and had a plot to it. The film is not scary at all, its more laughable than anything, and there is no plot in this film, it ended before it started. It is a good thing I read the book beforehand to know what was going on, otherwise, it is a waste of $12. Wait for it on DVD to rent it. But even then, you will have felt robbed. Bring Chris Columbus back, or someone who will go by the book. This is a hack job. Alfonso Cuaron totally destroyed the wonderful visions set out by the first two films. Instead of

User rating: June 23, 2004

Meh. How can anyone like such a movie?! I hated their portrayal... someone once said that the younger viewers are bound not to like this movie because it is more "mature"... I`m 14, I`ve read the whole series and have my own interpretation of the difference between whimsical, and "magic". I think that Christopher Columbus provided more of what viewers pictured while Alfonso Cuaron put whatever fit for the third movie alone. I believe that the director should be someone that has read the WHOLE series and actually understands what it`s all about. One word to say about this movie... disappointing >:(

User rating: June 22, 2004

I think that Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban give the dream world image to all the children and adults that see this magical world

User rating: June 22, 2004

i think its a good movie not great some parts are very lame make them a little maturer

User rating: June 22, 2004

i thougth that the movie was better when I saw it the second time. But it was too american. and the werewolfe was so un realisytic. andaniel`s fake crying was really bad, but hey, he still is the hotty.

User rating: June 22, 2004

In my opinion the 3rd HP was the best book out of the 5 existing books, so naturally shouldn’t the 3rd movie live up to the previous HP movies? Anyways my point is there was only one QIDDITCH match, and it doesn’t follow the previous flow of the other 2 movies. For me it wrecked the 3rd installment of HP. Please bring back Chris Columbus, or give Alfonso some HP filming lessons.

User rating: June 22, 2004

Definitely the BEST Harry Potter film yet...I was SOOOO pleased at the fact that the emotions of the film`s hero was shown to be raw and that he was in fact a "very human" teenager (we saw none of that in the first two movies)...another thing I loved was the cinematography of the film (very dark and `gothic-noir`)...the studio (WB) did us a favor by replacing Columbus with Alfonso Cuaron!

User rating: June 21, 2004

The movie was great, Daniel Radcliffe is sooo hot.

User rating: June 21, 2004

okay, what`s with dan`s FAKE crying?! and the dementors arent supposed to fly...they looked like E.T. under a cloak.

User rating: June 21, 2004

i thot it was awesome, but i wish chris columbus was the director. alfonso is great, but the whole plan in the first and second movies is gone. i can`t really reconize anything and the plan is so strange. nothing is as i thot it would be. there were so many things left out!