Based on 16515 votes and 263 reviews.
If this movie was based on historical fact then it was inaccurate. Despite of the constant battle I found it very slow and overacting so obvious. I kept on looking at my watch. The narration was the only good part of this movie.
well, this movie has been rated a 4, but most of the comments are against it, why... well because it sucked, way too long and like many others my boyfriend and i hung in there becuase we thought it cant be this bad there has to be a climax...were there was`nt, save ur money dont go see it, TROY now that way a great movie, this is not even worthy to compare....
this movie was confusing and irrelevant
it was long but amazing!!! Colin Farrel was great, and sexy.
too boring...same as troy...same stufff...no ideas..no story...y is this a good film?just becuase of all the famous hot stars?i don get it
When watching alexander, you must realize that in those times "gay" was not an issue, so one should not think of it as an issue today...
Too long and to boring
It was amazing. Please, anyone who might be swayed by someone to *not* see it, please watch it and see for yourself wheter you like it or not... I definiately plan on buying this movie...
People this movie tells a story about someone who lived in 300 B.C. How can you say the story was inaccurate. Greeks of that time looked different than today, do you know Greece was occupied by Turkey for over 300 years, that would get rid of anybodys "blond hair" and "blue eyes". Roxanne was not Persian, she was a Bactrian princess. If you do not know the history then shut up and do some research first.
Alexander the Great is not known to be "the great" due to his nobility but by his accomplishments in history. Everyone seem to know nothing. He was a figure built by his time and opportunity. And yes, homosexual activity used to be considered normal (it was common) untill our society fell behind.