Van Helsing Movie Poster

Van Helsing

User rating: 3.62 209 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 7, 2004

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Horror | 2h 12m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.62/5

User rating: 3.62

Based on 28742 votes and 209 reviews.


  • User rating: 17893 62.33%
  • User rating: 398 1.39%
  • User rating: 270 0.94%
  • User rating: 2014 7.02%
  • User rating: 8132 28.33%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 121-130 of 209 reviews

User rating: May 14, 2004

This movie was made for kids it should be rate G. The films should be more serious. Just take a look at Arnold`s movies Predator, Total Recall. There is a simple formula to movies blood, violence, nudity (some not a lot), course language, and make it serious. That`s all it takes for a good movie. (Gladiator, Matrix, Man on Fire)

User rating: May 14, 2004

Non-stop action. Hugh is sexy as ever and Dracula is the most amazing, chilling, sexy and humorous - he steals the show!!

User rating: May 14, 2004

terrible. it ripped off "the hunchback of N.D., Get smart, James Bond,Young Frankenstein, The Wizard of OZ, had terrible dialogue terrible plot, terrible accents, it is just plain TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

User rating: May 14, 2004

The director of the movie, Stephen Sommers, should never have the chance to direct a 100 million dollar movie for the rest of his career!

User rating: May 14, 2004

Truly dissappointing - I had higher expectations.

User rating: May 14, 2004

Van Helsing was a very good movie in ways and very corny in others. I started liking the movie about halfway through because that was when all the action comes in. You have to admit it was pretty cheesey at the ending but the grafics were amazing. It was good because it kept the guys entertained with action and four extremely hott and big breasted women and then for the ladies there was Hugh Jackman and the lack of clothing on his body. Realisticly he was the only good actor and the rest of them had very corny accents. In my opinion it was quite creative but a bit media based, it could have been better. It would have been better if I saw it i

User rating: May 14, 2004

I think the visual affects actually sucked quite badly... The first few shots of castle Frankenstine looked like something I can render on my computer in 30 mins... My friend thought that was part of the commercial. The movie gets quite cheesy with the vampire wifes (who fly around laughing like idiolts). Anyway, the movie is not without merit... it does have some actions, but I can only recommend it as a cheap Tuesday movie or a rental.

User rating: May 13, 2004

I THOUGHT THIS MOVIE HAD POTENTIAL! I WAS FOOLED! It did have great special effects, though. That`s the only thing I liked about it. The plot was brain-dead and the acting was definitely not the best. I would not recommend this movie to everybody. If you like special effects and are curious about it, then go see it. Otherwise, save your money and go see some other flick. Thanks for reading.

User rating: May 13, 2004

Hugh Jackmen was great, ending was horrible, almost ruined the movie for me.

User rating: May 13, 2004

It was the worst movie I have ever seen! plot sucked big time...*goosebumps* wannabe. dont waste your money!