Twilight Movie Poster

Twilight

User rating: 3.92 1274 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: November 21, 2008

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Drama, Horror, Other, Romance | 2h 1m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.92/5

User rating: 3.92

Based on 20025 votes and 1274 reviews.


  • User rating: 1859 56.32%
  • User rating: 439 13.30%
  • User rating: 363 11.00%
  • User rating: 169 5.12%
  • User rating: 471 14.27%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 991-1000 of 1274 reviews

User rating: November 22, 2008

I read all 4 books, and i thought the movie was great!! Obviously the movie is never good as the book, but I think they did a great job with the movie. Also, some people had very high expectations, which is why they did not like the movie. I loved the books and the movie and hope the other movies are as great as this one =)

User rating: November 22, 2008

I really enjoyed the movie it wasn't the same as the book but it was still an awsome movie and I can't wait for them to make the other 3 into movies

User rating: November 22, 2008

The movie was horrible! The acting was bad, but it seemed like every actor was bad. I believe this is the result of a bad director! The movie was true to the story but it could have been much much better even with a small budget.

User rating: November 22, 2008

lol. This is the movie of the year

User rating: November 22, 2008

it was nothing like the book they left out many parts

User rating: November 22, 2008

I loved the feel of the film adaptation of Twilight. I loved that it was not an over-the-top commercial production. I love that the film added and altered scenes, it would have been boring to have watched a literal translation of the book. As far as critics of the special effects and cheezy moments, did you not read the book? I loved the books, but let's face it, we're not talking the quality of Tanya Huff when it comes to vampire stories. Good think too, as this is something my daughter is reading and watching. I am over the moon in anticipation of New Moon on film. I hope that with the success of the first film, the second doesn't become overly commercialized. I think the critics need to b

User rating: November 22, 2008

I think that the whole movie was horrable compared to the book and as for the cast, I didn't think they were all that talented. I'm sorry to everyone who does, but to me, they could have done a lot better, with the casting and the scenes.

User rating: November 22, 2008

movie was amazing from a movie persepective, though the acting wasnt the best. Compared to the book it wasnt as good. but overall I LOVED THE MOVIE

User rating: November 22, 2008

You can't expect a movie to be as good as the book, they can 't put 500+ pages in 2 hours. The acting was very poor though. Rob is not a great actor, it's true. The make up was very poor, nothing was right, I was not disappointed by how they changed the story (a little bit) that was expected, but I thought the acting would be good and it was not. Like when Edward sees Bella in the bio lab for the first time, wth was that performance from rob????? he looked like he was gonna throw up!!! I'm really disapointed by Rob's acting. I'd rather see an "ok looking" good actor than a cute vampire who doesn't even know how to stare properly at Bella :( And Carlisle was too freaking white!! wth?? the m

User rating: November 22, 2008

PLEASE make New Moon and do the books more justice. While I thought the movie was okay, and I think I'll enjoy it after watching it a seond time, I think the lack of funding made some parts cheesy and have someone else write the script. I didn't think the characters in the movie showed even half the connection that Bella and Edward had in the book. BUT Rob Pattinson is the PERFECT Edward, so he definitely needs to come back. :) He was exactly what I pictured.