Based on 63556 votes and 2163 reviews.
Very interesting
Excellent movie and now I`m going to read the book.
Not bad if you hanve.t read the book, otherwise not so good!
Average movie - nothing spectacular
I have read the book first and was debating whether I should see the movie. I was afraid to spoil the effect the book had on me. I think that the movie stands better on its own. I found that the characters were somewhat disconnected. I think Ron Howard did his best bringing the story to life, however the story itself was too powerful and encompassed so much more that the movie would leave much more to the imagination. Nothing can replace the richness of the experience of imagination when reading a really good book. I think the book should have been left a book...but this is just my opinion and only from one point of view. If I didn`t read the
It was a good movie, well written, well acted. I believe it is more so of a rental, not to say it is a bad movie but not worth spending the $12 it costs to see it in a theatre.
was as great as the book. l loved it.
a good movie to see
Not having read the book as yet, I had nothing to relate it to, and so I just took it for what it is - a movie, and an entertaining one at that. At one point I thought I was watching a sequel of sorts to National Treasure, which I also thoroughly enjoined. I have read that it can get confusing, but the movie does make efforts to explain those areas, so I only found a piece here and there that escaped me, but it did not leave me confused to where I didn`t know what was going on. I thought the casting was very well done, and as usaul, Ian McClellan delivers a suberb performance. Overall, I thought the movie accomplished what I was looking for a
Absolutely loved it.I read the book first,then saw the movie.I thought the film was every bit as good as the book.