Based on 9489 votes and 252 reviews.
whoever the James Bond would be good depends on the Director of the movie. Previous JB movies are lot better in terms of high technology and stunts. This one and the one before this seems like that the producer of these last two JB movies did not want to spend good amount of money for such. It should be showing more high tech stuffs but nothing. Invest more on High tech...what a shame!
Actually, impressive and stunning action scenes, but agonizingly difficult plot to follow. I had to come home and read on the internet about what exactly the story was about. It's confusing to the point where by mid-point of the movie, one is constantly checking the watch to find out when the movie will end.
Strike 2 for Craig, another bad bond film. Why are people's standard for bond become so low?
Casino Royale was much better since it showed the evolution of Bond. This movie is pure testosterone action.
firstt one is better....definitely more action in this one....but i didn't come away with the same feeling as the first one
Very disappointed........this movie is an insult to all precious 007 movious.. the best I would give this production is a 2 star.
Just an awful story. Confused and Muddled. I really disliked this movie.
I am the #1 Bond fan. Always have been, always will be. This movie made me feel so sad. Such dissapointment, I still cannot believe that after awaiting this film for over a year it was so horrible. The director should and the screen writers should be ashamed of this project!
i agree with all above viewers. very bad. not worth a star. craig is not bad, but director, screenplay very poor. no scenery, only action, action , motion but no brain.
I thought the movie was pretty good being that it is a 007 movie and I found the action was more exciting but short. I just prefer Casino Royale more than this movie.