Based on 9489 votes and 252 reviews.
I wished the editing in the movie wasn't so choppy. Scenes go by so fast, you can barely appreciate them. Also, the ending was a bit abrupt. I think they could have stretched the 105 min movie another 5 minutes so we could see Bond interrogate Vesper's boyfriend. After all, that has been driving him throughout the whole movie. Finally, they go all over the world but the scenery wasn't as photogenic as in Casino Royale. Not as good as Casino Royale but still worth the money.
This isn't supposed to be like all the other James Bond movies now is it? James bond without ridiculous silly gadgets, a man who truly deserves a license to kill as apposed to brosnan who has a license to comb his hair. Bond is a spy who in a circumstance finds his target does his thing and gets out, assessing the situation and executing. A bond movie that wasn't a joke so all those who say "this is a disgrace" are putting it in the same category as the olds but its its own thing altogether. Story was a bit lost but that was bout all that was wrong with it.
Wow i guess they should have made the movie less realistic and bring back all of the elements that made the older Bond movies so dull. The Movie was good, the fight scenes were great, and it felt more like an espionage flick rather than a pretty boy blowing stuff up with chewing gum, and a swiss army knife/rocket launcher. The camera work was more rugged and made to feel as though you are part of the action, although i think that the effect will be lost on the more simple folk that these Bond movies tend to appeal to. Overall good movie, Daniel Craig is the best Bond to date, sorry Mr. Connery.
very good movie
The movie contianed all the action packed scenes you would enjoy, and the re-introduction of the crime sydicate Quantum (formally Spector)refreshs original bond polt adapted for the modern age fan!
James Bond is a spy right? What happened to all of his gadgets?...All of the action sequences were shot with the cameraman sitting on a jackhammer-so blurry you could only see the slow parts of the film, when Daniel Craig is standing still.Don't even get me started about the villains......D.C. is still an excellent actor, and a fitting James Bond however the entire film fell short. I have to wonder what the director was thinking at times.....
no gadgets , drives a ford pickup, thats the best car,
Dissapointing I was expecting much more action this movie was so boring in part I found myself wishing it would just be over so I could get out of this crappy seat.
Daniel Craig has done an excellent job in this movie , i did'nt feel he needed to shake or stir anything, it was fine the way it is. I saw the movie and i loved it. Every one is entitled to their own opinion and my opinion says "two thumbs way up", and another thing people wondered why he didnt get more women into his bed, (just 1) well, we are living in an age of spiralling numbers of people infected with HIV AND EVERY THING ELSE, 007 needs to quit with the whoring around. And to end my rant GO SEE IT.
This movie needs a better intro, cars, gadgets, suspense, music, direction, plot, lines, humour, villains, less M, gambling, less cia, longer film, better editing, product placements, go take a look at what made casino royale good and stop trying to make a artistic wannabe bourne film. Don't mess with a tried and proven formula, Ian flemming would not be happy! C-