The Bourne Supremacy Movie Poster

The Bourne Supremacy

User rating: 4.06 147 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: July 23, 2004

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Drama, Thriller | 1h 48m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.06/5

User rating: 4.06

Based on 17239 votes and 147 reviews.


  • User rating: 12681 73.67%
  • User rating: 421 2.45%
  • User rating: 203 1.18%
  • User rating: 297 1.73%
  • User rating: 3612 20.98%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 31-40 of 147 reviews

User rating: October 5, 2004

Great movie, absolutely brutal camera work.

User rating: October 2, 2004

I think it was the best movie so far this year. The camera work makes you feel a bit dizzy but with such action, you feel like you`re actually part of the movie.

User rating: September 8, 2004

Yes, the camera work is choppy and it was a bit frustrating trying to watch the fight scenes for example. I think the first movie was better - Matt Damon definitely had the action moves down and it a pity the cameras were too close to see them in the second movie. Even so, it was a good movie. A friend and I are arguing about which is the best car chase.

User rating: September 2, 2004

Bourne Supermecy was awesome just down right awesome. Matt Damon is a briliant actor and in my opinion did a better job this time around. The script is great and it keeps you guessing till the end.Go spend 10 bucks.its not a waste.-Rytoss

User rating: September 1, 2004

it was awsome just scary for kids....

User rating: September 1, 2004

Great movie...but not as great as "Bourne Identity" though.I really wish i could`ve enjoyed it more but I think the problem with this movie is that most of the story revolves around the agency trying to get Bourne...instead of Bourne himself.I would give this movie (because i loved the actual story) a 4 out of 5.

User rating: August 31, 2004

Awesome!!!!! just as good as the first. Can`t wait for The Bourne Ultimatum!!!

User rating: August 30, 2004

Great movie but terrible cinemetography. It was shot too close for my liking and that along with the unsteady camera actually caused me to turn away from the screen on more than one occasion. It may be considered to be artsy or creative but as an artsy, creative person, I`d still prefer to watch a movie that I can actually focus on and follow. It was a good movie....too bad for the camera work....it could have been great.

User rating: August 29, 2004

two words. wow

User rating: August 29, 2004

The story was awsome! Lost of great stuff to work with! Constant action that captures attention, that`s for sure. Matt Damon, as always, a great actor! Too bad the scenes were filmed so close up though. The camera didn`t look that steady and the scenes kept flipping...WAY TOO FAST! It was dizzying! And that wasn`t even during the action scenes...for those they might just as well have faded to black and played the audio...lol...I`m sure the audience wouldn`t have gotten any more lost that way! All in all, it was a great movie. I just think wide angle shots and editing to make the scenes a little longer and not so jumpy would have mad