Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Movie Poster

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith

User rating: 4.31 692 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 19, 2005

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi | 2h 20m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.31/5

User rating: 4.31

Based on 38186 votes and 692 reviews.


  • User rating: 29699 79.97%
  • User rating: 961 2.59%
  • User rating: 335 0.90%
  • User rating: 649 1.75%
  • User rating: 5494 14.79%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 201-210 of 692 reviews

User rating: June 6, 2005

Haydens HOTTTTT...and yodas the best of alllll......5 stars for the creature

User rating: June 6, 2005

wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow the best movie ever i skipped school to watch it and i wasnt disapointed

User rating: June 6, 2005

The movie closed the gap between the origianl Star Wars movie and Star Wars:Episode II. The acting needed more passion and character. I found the acting rather flat.

User rating: June 6, 2005

the movie was soOoOO cool if you havent seen it yet go see it it is better than all the other ones (i think):)

User rating: June 6, 2005

Half way through the movie I got bored.

User rating: June 5, 2005

Hayden Christonson really showed an element of darkness which showes he understands the character very well.

User rating: June 5, 2005

cool! i watched it twice already...

User rating: June 5, 2005

Great movie, Lucas needed to develop the characters better, the whole series was rushed. But ROTS was best by far.

User rating: June 5, 2005

it was an average movie not coming close to my expectations

User rating: June 5, 2005

You cant compare this movie with 4,5,6. They were a different set of movies, different time, different actors, technology, etc. Although the story of this LEADS into the 4,5,6 trilogy, its a movie in the catagory of 1,2 and 3. My personal Favorite from ALL 6, and.... hey... watch a movie, and enjoy it :) All movies have SOME negative aspects, but this one had very few.