Star Trek Into Darkness Movie Poster

Star Trek Into Darkness

User rating: 4.22 107 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 16, 2013

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi | 2h 12m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.22/5

User rating: 4.22

Based on 300 votes and 107 reviews.


  • User rating: 188 65.28%
  • User rating: 48 16.67%
  • User rating: 12 4.17%
  • User rating: 6 2.08%
  • User rating: 34 11.81%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 31-40 of 107 reviews

User rating: May 29, 2013

The only people this movie appeals to are people that watched the first startrek by jj abrams, and people that don't really know star trek...to them this is just scifi show and if that Is the case, for sure this would look good and be like an amazing film to be sure. for those that watched star trek and know what's up, this movie spits in your face. if it doen't then you are a guy that says yeah i seen it, would watch another show if it's on and then back up this new trek garbage. i bet you guys like superman returns too, with the storyline and him having a kid...or better yet the batman and robin movie was your favorite of the batman series, cuz let me guess you really like the neon colou

User rating: May 29, 2013

the theaters, that alone tells you they messed up. they will take a loss even with dvd sales and rights to air. maybe next time they will smarten up and go boldy go where no one has gone before or will they just copy star trek 4, and call the next one the Vulcan voyage home. to you idiots that say it's new and and different storyline, great , use that new time line background but have the decency to give us a new story in that background...that is the difference you fail to understand why people don't care for this crap.

User rating: May 29, 2013

Take out the glitz and glamour because that can be applied to any movie, the storyline was a rehash, plain and simple. They couldn't come up with something original so they copied the one star trek movie that is a fan favorite and made them lots of money. anyone who says oh its different, yah not slight difference to the same storyline is like watching several remakes on the same story, how many of you want to watch another 3 musketeers or romeo and Juliet on screen...anyhow, this movie lost money anyhow it costed over 300 million 190 to make and 125 in advertising. it's take dropped in half in 1 week and will probably drop another 1/2 by next week. and it's gross not even what is paid to

User rating: May 29, 2013

Welcome back, Gary Mitchell!

User rating: May 28, 2013

Nowhere near as good as the first instalment:(

User rating: May 28, 2013

wow..after reading some of the mixed reviews.. i have to say you guys are crazy... this movies is fantastic.. sooo good!!!!

User rating: May 28, 2013

Brilliant. Well definitely own on Blu-ray.

User rating: May 28, 2013

I just read some of the reviews and to all of you who gave this film only 1 star - SHAME ON YOU!! I have seen all previous Star Trek films and NOT ONE of them can even come close to this one. It is by far the best of them all. I thought the first JJ Abrams Star Trek was good - this one tops it and then some. This film will appeal to anyone who likes the sci-fi genre - not just Trekkies. Bottom line - the best film of the year thus far.

User rating: May 27, 2013

Clearly there are rival studio 'plants' making the grade suck. They are idiots and don't know good entertainment. To have that many people you have to write stories for and many twists and give them all decent screen time away from the wicked f/x...I say kudos. These nay-sayers couldn't do it.

User rating: May 27, 2013

I want to see it again and again. Rarely can a sequel equal or top the 'original' let a lone a reboot of a franchise, this one rocked and sets up the new future against Klingons and a supervillan (no spoiler alert)!