Spider-Man 3 Movie Poster

Spider-Man 3

User rating: 3.07 398 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 4, 2007

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Thriller | 2h 20m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.07/5

User rating: 3.07

Based on 9820 votes and 398 reviews.


  • User rating: 473 33.10%
  • User rating: 118 8.26%
  • User rating: 272 19.03%
  • User rating: 168 11.76%
  • User rating: 398 27.85%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 281-290 of 398 reviews

User rating: May 6, 2007

Save your money and watch the DVD when it comes out.

User rating: May 6, 2007

as you've probably read... the majority casts this movie as a disappointment... AND IT IS! You still have to watch it though - fighting scenes make it worth while. Venom could be A LOT BETTER as he's Spidey's arch nemsis...

User rating: May 6, 2007

Spidey 3 was a great movie. Before I say anything else, I want to ask all you spidey fans out there. When you watched spidey and spidey 2, did you get this feeling that you wanted more spidey, more effects, more villains, and more great acting from great actors? I did. That's what made me wanting to watch this last one, because, for now, there may not be a 4th, 5th, or 6th one, because none of the cast and crew, want to do more. So watch this movie because even though it has too much crying, sad scenes, and the action scenes are spread apart, in the end, I know you'll like or love, this movie, even by a tiny bit, as you come to this website and give it a 1 star rating. That's okay. But I kno

User rating: May 6, 2007

I was expecting a action movie all i got was a poorly acted love story.Most of us were there to see venom and not watch kirsten dunst drone on and on.How long is this piece of drivel.

User rating: May 6, 2007

As you would expect great special effects. But, Toby and Kristen where terrible, especially at crying. Pretty bad when the audience laughs at what's supposed to be a sad scene. This movie was too slow for an action flick. Needed to see alot more of Spidey than we did. Afterall, he's the real star of the show.

User rating: May 6, 2007

Hmm. Another tough one. It wasn't horrible. It wasn't amazing. It wasn't average. But I did enjoy it quite a bit. The CGI of Venom was PERFECT, and even Topher Grace did a good job as Eddie Brock. As one would think from all the marketing of the film, there is a LOT of stuff in this movie even though it's almost 2.5 hours long. They did a good job editing it, but there is an almost absolute certainty that there will be an extended version coming out at some point. As I said, there is a lot of stuff in this movie, but I honestly can't see how they'd be able to take either Venom, Sandman, or Gwen Stacey out of the movie and have it actually better. In fact, in my opinion, if they removed any o

User rating: May 6, 2007

Too much hype!!! It was aweful trying to tie up loose ends. The suit to make him a cocky, hated person.. Is more an idiot, comedy in all the wrong times and places. Just wait to go on video.

User rating: May 6, 2007

Should be called Cryerman. How many times can Spiderman cry? And what was with the Saturday Night Fever bit in the middle? By far the weakest of the 3. The only saving grace was the action scenes, when they eventually got to them. Very disappointed.

User rating: May 6, 2007

Worst in the trilogy

User rating: May 6, 2007

i dont know why every one says spiderman 3 was a bad movie,in my opinion it was long but the best out of the 3,how many comic book movies can have 3 movies that sell and every one loves,the movie had venom(who i dont believe is dead)and sandman even new green goblin was good,thats just in my opinion i dont care what no one else thinks