Quantum of Solace Movie Poster

Quantum of Solace

User rating: 2.95 252 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: November 14, 2008

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Drama, Thriller | 1h 47m

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.95/5

User rating: 2.95

Based on 9489 votes and 252 reviews.


  • User rating: 296 25.11%
  • User rating: 205 17.39%
  • User rating: 202 17.13%
  • User rating: 96 8.14%
  • User rating: 380 32.23%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 211-220 of 252 reviews

User rating: November 16, 2008

What happened to James Bond? Barely any car chases, no sweet gadgets... This movie has gone to the toilets.

User rating: November 16, 2008

No gadgets...no Q...bonds boss taking a bath...choppy action...no plot...give me Goldeneye anytime

User rating: November 16, 2008

i love the movie....

User rating: November 16, 2008

I liked this movie for a few reasons. One, its my first bond movie. I could not stand the old ones. Why should there be a man who is the terrestrial Captain Kirk, with woman who are vapid dominatricies? And what is with the oil all over Connery? The acting was solid, the plot existed, there was action for the 4year old men in 40 year old bodies. Basically, if you've watched Indiana Jones, X-files, and so many other films this summer, the bar had been set so low that the only way to go from there was up. Yes, it may have been setting up another sequel. So what? As long as they can do better than the Pirates of the Carribean franchise, they'll definately get my 10 bucks.

User rating: November 16, 2008

Not since Timothy Dalton played Bond, has there been a 007 film this poor. The action is scatter shot, the story is piss-poor, and the villian is just pathetic. Here's hoping the next 007 film gets back to telling a story!

User rating: November 15, 2008

Casino Royale was much better, the intro music was average, no Q and gadgets, no fancy cars, no poker, villian was avg with no noticable traits like bleeding from the eyes/bullet lodged in head, bond never was in danger and just didn't deliver what I come to expect after watching casino royale. Hope the next one will have a nuclear threat, some fancy gadgets, better plot and villians. They could have done so much more with this one, instead of a follow up to Casino Royale, a higher stake plot and chance to develop this version of bond more. Also very dissapointed there was no star trek full trailer as promised attached, 2/5

User rating: November 15, 2008

Great movie, aother for collection. What I didn't like was what other mentioned, 24/7 killing, not a lot of talking, bond is constantly covered in blood, he's not smooth as his predecessors, actions are shot too fast maiking it hard to figure out who does what. But still worth watching, u learn on mistakes.

User rating: November 15, 2008

I'm a fan of 007 but this 1 is a piece of garbage

User rating: November 15, 2008

I enjoyed the movie just for Craig and Dench, however, I do agree with many of the previous comments about the action sequences being edited very "tight" and not sure who did what to whom. It is good fune however and if you are a Bond fan go see it. 3 stars.

User rating: November 15, 2008

Daniel Craig is the best James Bond since Sean Connery. Great movie and lots of action.