Based on 262 votes and 93 reviews.
Bad music bad cinematography bad connection between the actors . Most of the children were sound asleep in the theater
It didn't have the same dash and verve as the original. The best characters were portrayed by the children, Dick Van Dyke, Angela Lansbury, and Meryl Streep. Blunts performance of Mary Poppins gave the character a self important air. None of the music stayed with me when we left . Kudos to the costume designer and most of the choreography.
It was disjointed. And we didnt come away singing any of the music. Disappointing movie.
I actually didn't like the old one, I thought it was pretty hokey. Even when I was a kid. The only thing I liked about it was the kids and the era it was set in. But this one was good. Better than the original. Has the same old-timey feel. Emily Blunt was good. Not as sweet as Julie Andrews, but still good in her own right.
It's a cute film, and Emily Blunt does a good job. I remember the original Mary Poppins. Mary Poppins Returns has no spark, no magic, nothing exciting. The best thing was when Dick Van Dyke made a brief appearance. However, it's a clean, decent movie for kids, but I'm not sure what age group.
In Mary Poppins words, It's perfect in every way. Loved this movie.
Most of the movie was painful to watch. If Walt was alive, he would have done it right.
it was ok. My granddaughter loved it, but i found it was a boring at times. I was a little disappointed with the movie.
Walked out And got my our money back 30 minutes into it
Poor remake. Blunt is boring