Based on 174 votes and 67 reviews.
His innocence of being an heir to the throne is what I like and my dislike is the hardship to convince him to fight.
The show was fabulous they released it at the wrong time... SO WORTH SEEING
Is there a vote for Zero stars? This was Crap!!! Story telling was garbage. It was like they took LODRs, and the Iliad and then added the characters of the Arthur legend. I wish I could get my 2 hours back.
Lot's of action. Better than I thought going in. Still like the Clive Owen version of Arthur better.
The scenery, costumes, action scenes, etc were spectacular despite the poor ratings. We were definitely entertained by the developing story and all the action.
One of my favourite movies so far this year. I think I'm a teenie bit in love with Charlie Hunnam now.
Loved it!! It was like Lord of the Rings meets a Marvel movie.
Ok so this was a fun action filled movie. Don't listen to the nay sayers or the critics. No it doesn't follow the story of your mom and dads king Arthur and that's ok. They are trying something new. I really enjoyed the different take on the story. And would go see it again. Hope they make a sequel
Not Oscar material...but entertaining and fun to watch....if you don't over analyze this and just sit back and enjoy you will like it.!!!!!
No, No No ... How do you tell the Legend of the Sword / King Arthur without the entire cast of characters? Merlin is mere mention, Mogana is nowhere to be seen. No Lancelot, no Guinevere (sequels maybe - God save us). The montage style of storytelling is confusing. It worked in other Guy Ritchie films but not here. 3D effects were weak. Story telling was incomplete. Horribly disappointed.