Jack Reacher: Never Go Back Movie Poster

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

User rating: 2.41 108 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: October 21, 2016

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Thriller | 1h 58m

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.41/5

User rating: 2.41

Based on 288 votes and 108 reviews.


  • User rating: 62 24.41%
  • User rating: 24 9.45%
  • User rating: 10 3.94%
  • User rating: 18 7.09%
  • User rating: 140 55.12%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 31-40 of 108 reviews

User rating: December 30, 2016

Very good very well done good action tom cruise does one hell of a job in this show

User rating: December 29, 2016

After seeing this one, I will now state I will never again waste my money on a Tom Cruise film. This was horrible.

User rating: December 28, 2016

You know, this one's another flop for Cruise.

User rating: December 27, 2016

Tom Cruise is no longer a viable box office star, which is very relevant in this movie. Why oh why does he have that one expression....how stupid!

User rating: December 26, 2016

As part of the title states: Never Go Back. And that means to any of Tom Cruises' movies again. This was dreadful.

User rating: December 23, 2016

Another good one for Tom Cruise, who keeps giving us reasons to want to go to the theatre. Plenty of action, with Jack Reacher working his 'magic' in one scene after another, and a good story line that keeps the protagonists busy following the twists and turns. Last time I checked, box office numbers had reached over $160 million on a budget of $60 million -- pretty good since the movie (like the first installment) was so poorly promoted.

User rating: December 22, 2016

This wasn't even worth the reduced price I saw it for.

User rating: December 20, 2016

This is the last Tom Cruise movie I am ever going to see. I will not waste another cent on this guy. He's a terrible actor.

User rating: December 19, 2016

It sure would be nice if Tom had more than one expression on his face. This one is ridiculous.

User rating: December 18, 2016

Tom hasn't done a decent movie in years, and this one is no different. His facial expression (yes, he only has one in this movie) was painful to watch.