Hostel Movie Poster

Hostel

User rating: 3.16 189 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: January 6, 2006

R | Horror | 1h 35m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.16/5

User rating: 3.16

Based on 4106 votes and 189 reviews.


  • User rating: 502 40.06%
  • User rating: 141 11.25%
  • User rating: 104 8.30%
  • User rating: 67 5.35%
  • User rating: 439 35.04%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 111-120 of 189 reviews

User rating: January 14, 2006

It was absoluty brutal. One of the worst movies I have ever seen! The first half of the movie I thought I was watching soft core porn. Was not scary at all. Story line was awful. Do not waste your time and money and this movie. Big disapointment.

User rating: January 14, 2006

how can i guy can run for half of the movie with his finger choped and holding the fingers.

User rating: January 14, 2006

DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE! This is the worst trash I have ever seen, I want my money back NOW! Bum jokes, bad dialog, bad "Eurotrip-ish" beginning, the worst acting I have EVER seen. I have never been this upset after seeing a movie. I can’t believe Quentin Tarantino helped produced this, I can’t believe he would have his name ANYWHERE NEAR Trash. You have been warned!

User rating: January 13, 2006

Great premise...however the story could have played out better. This movies can wait for video.

User rating: January 13, 2006

I will give it an E for Effort. Is the director successful in creating horror and tension through his skills? Nah, gimme a break. The only reason if the audience were scared by it is because this "movie" is only, lazily, deliver the raw image of blood and gore to the screen. If a person is really talented, s/he will be able to generate the tension and horror through the mood/tone of the story by itself, instead of simply presenting the bare disgusting image to scare the audidence. A real good and talented director/writer can tell a truly scary and horrible story without a mention of one single drop of blood. This "movie" is waaaaaaaay l

User rating: January 13, 2006

Again like the previous reviewer, I am a fan of Saw 1 and 2, but this movie could not compare to it. The special effects of the gore was really well done, and honestly I havent seen so many breasts in a movie since watching a porno. This movie`s plot is even worse than House of Wax, the only thing that stopped me from giving this movie a 1 or 2 star was because of the special effects. 3 stars Max, and thats even pushing it.

User rating: January 13, 2006

I ended up feeling very nauseous during this film, but also, half of it was just women in the nude. When you put the two together, you get Breasts and Blood! What kind of 12 year old thought of this? Too basic and not even talented.

User rating: January 13, 2006

I`M fan of Saw 1 and 2, BUTTT, this movie is simply GROSS! the gore is EXTREME!! Its SICK! If u want ur GF to hold u tight during a movie then go watch it! as a bonus for guys, movie also displays beautiful/hot/horny european girls ;) i give it 3/5, mainly cuz its a one-time movie as no one will have the heart to watch it again!!

User rating: January 13, 2006

Terrible subject matter. Should not have been produced. How does this stuff get on screen? The synopsis should be rewritten so we`d know enough not to go see this. What a betrayal to moviegoers!

User rating: January 12, 2006

Absolutely disturbing! It is horrible to think that any mind, no matter how sick and twisted it is could come up with that concept. I have to admit the acting was quite amazing, bravo to jay hernandez, but as the other reviewers have said 1st hour = soft core porn, the last 30 minutes = gore fest. I would almost like to scream at everyone and say dont see it, its disturbing... but we all knew going into it that it was a horror movie, don`t complain about what is clearly stated in the movie trailer. But a WARNING: if you are at all weak stomached, or easier scared, just skip this one.