Based on 14884 votes and 121 reviews.
Excellent movie. The only negative is the plague that creates the zombies is never explained. Just go along with the premise and you`ll enjoy the ride. Also, wait for the credits to roll so see the "real" ending.
I thought Dawn of the dead the orignal was totally better ,but this one was less boring,there wasnt enuff blood and guts.They should have had a better ending.
good movie
WOW! I DIDNT KNOW THIS WAS A CANADIAN MOVIE! AND IM CANADIAN AND PEOPLE LOVE THIS FILM. but sry to say i dont =P
Horror movies usually makes me laugh, they just never scare me. But this is the first that hit a nerve! It`s about basic human survival under the worst circumstance. It just gave me the creeps...AWESOME! Good acting. Cool FX . And great direction.
great remake!
This was an excellent movie & I`m 67 years old. I didn`t really wan`t to go but my grandchildren persuaded me to take them...Otherwise, they couldn`t have gotten in because it was rated "R"....One of the fastest moving action movies that I`ve ever seen(with great music, hunor,acting,& direction...Whoever this director is, he`s got a great future.....Ed
Dawn of the Dead (2004) is obviously superior to the original. People hate the fast zombies. Some say they are impossible. The truth is zombies in general are impossible. Slow or fast. In order for the human body to achieve mobility, the body must have blood flowing through it. Romero established the fact that zombies didn`t need any of their internal organs to move. Just their brains, but the muscles in the human body cannot work without blood and oxygen getting to them. The only way blood and oxygen would be able to get to the muscles is if the heart and the lungs are operating. The lungs fill the blood with oxygen and the blood is pumpe
Great movie, however it could have gone on a little longer.
Dawn of the dead was an amazing movie. I mean, you don`t see horror movies like this. Most get 1 star or 2 stars. This one, however ahd good acting,awesome effects and an awesome movie