Clash of the Titans Movie Poster

Clash of the Titans

User rating: 3.36 234 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: April 2, 2010

PG-13 | Action, Adventure | 1h 46m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.36/5

User rating: 3.36

Based on 1078 votes and 234 reviews.


  • User rating: 145 32.37%
  • User rating: 73 16.29%
  • User rating: 106 23.66%
  • User rating: 48 10.71%
  • User rating: 76 16.96%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 111-120 of 234 reviews

User rating: June 30, 2010

I prefer this movie (and all movies) in NOT 3D! I loved the cinematography! Great action and plot! Amazing actors and costumes!

User rating: June 29, 2010

It's a half hour too long

User rating: June 29, 2010

When will they learn. Remaking a bad movie with new fangled special effects does not make it better. The original movie was so bad, it's fun to watch for camp value alone, as well as the cutting edge stop motion animation. The remake is a snore with very expensive SFX. Not even worth a rental.

User rating: June 29, 2010

Although there were some good action sequences the abundance of massive plot holes along with the selection of shots obviously scripted specifically for 3D with no regard for the advancement of the story equals a failing grade.

User rating: June 29, 2010

This is a fantastic movie to watch. I have seen the previous movie - This one, thanks to technology, has a greater impact. Good story line and characters

User rating: June 29, 2010

A terrible movie. Signifies everything that is wrong with modern movies. Lazy script, unimaginative special effects and poor character development. I never thought a movie with giant scorpions could be so uninteresting.

User rating: June 29, 2010

Good story. Bad effects.

User rating: June 29, 2010

Very few remakes are as good as the original. Good acting, story, action and special effects make this a movie worth seeing.

User rating: June 29, 2010

What an amazing movie. Reminds me a lot like the God of War games. Definitely recommended.

User rating: June 29, 2010

It wasn't that bad but I have not seen the original to compare it too.