A Nightmare on Elm Street Movie Poster

A Nightmare on Elm Street

User rating: 2.98 158 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: April 30, 2010

R | Fantasy, Horror, Sci-Fi, Thriller | 1h 35m

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.98/5

User rating: 2.98

Based on 551 votes and 158 reviews.


  • User rating: 87 31.07%
  • User rating: 34 12.14%
  • User rating: 34 12.14%
  • User rating: 37 13.21%
  • User rating: 88 31.43%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 41-50 of 158 reviews

User rating: July 2, 2010

Definitely a must see.

User rating: July 2, 2010

I remember the original as being much better and scarier.

User rating: July 2, 2010

Awful.

User rating: July 2, 2010

A good remake that had incredibly better makeup this time around. A really good telling of the story that went into more detail than the original did.

User rating: July 1, 2010

save your money, worst movie of the year

User rating: July 1, 2010

Remaking the classic Nightmare on Elm Street, Freddy Krueger’s past is revealed and for a group of teenagers, staying awake is more important now than ever before. This was a typical teenage slasher flick with very little suspense at all. There was one scene that was a little disturbing involving one of the teenager’s desperate pleas using a webcam, as well and the part involving the song “All I have to do is dream” that was playing in the drugstore where both characters seemed to be in a alternate comatose states of mind. Otherwise, I felt that this movie really lacked in its delivery. I still very much prefer the original Nightmare on Elm Street series which had moments where my heart w

User rating: July 1, 2010

i think they are losing their touch,needed more scare factor

User rating: June 30, 2010

I thought the cast was nicely chosen, there was the right amount of gore and scary scenes, and i liked how there was a story behind it (and it was not only about gore). Great horror movie!

User rating: June 30, 2010

I really enjoyed this movie. It wasnt like the original but I did enjoy it overall. I was very pleased to see Kellan Lutz in here! :)

User rating: June 29, 2010

Pointless remake. If they insisted on going there, then they should have done a re-imagining rather than a recreation. See the original and save your money.