Based on 594 votes and 108 reviews.
Daniel Craig and Christopher Walz (brilliant actor playing the villian like in Tarzan) were great in this 007 movie but the choice of leading ladies was less than a wow factor a there were better actresses to choose from despite her successes. I was disappointed, like many, in the choices of female cast members but as usual, Moneypenny was good in her role.
Typical Bond movie. Which is worth seeing
This is isn't the worst bond film but not the best . Especially after following up skyfall which may be the best one ever. Got away from daniel craig serious vicious bond and went back to 60's hokey at times . Entertaining but a bit of a letdown
Awesome bond flick! D. Craig is definitely a great Bond. That's James Bond!
Best Craig movie after Casino Royale. I preferred this one over Skyfall.
Best Bond movie since Skyfall.
Solid Bond flick, good action.
Daniel Craig is spot on in his gritty yet dashing portrayal of the world's favourite secret agent. Go see it again and you'll see what I mean.
Daniel Craig is a poor Bond. Hugh Jackman would make a much more elegant Bond. Bond is supposed to be tall and handsome, with elegance and charm. Craig has none of these traits.
Well Bond survived again but I do believe this movie has killed the Bond franchise. It was so bad I cannot find the words to describe it. It was so far out that it became bad SciFi. Just another indistructable super hero. Producers should find a very good mystery/adventure story and drop Bond into it and include more of the real world and life and then maybe we could again find an emotional connection to Bond. Crieg would be great if they gave him something to work with.