Based on 60 votes and 18 reviews.
I am sci fi fanatic but this rubbish is an insult. It does not deserves a 1 star either. Do no waste your time. Battle: Los Angeles is a different movie. The acting is very poor, I would prefer to watch the old godzilla alike japanese movies from the late 70's that this called "film".
The vast majority of reviewers (over 50%) gave this movie a rating of 1 star and for good reason. I had the misfortune of watching this movie when a buddy of mine thought he found "Battle: Los Angeles" on NetFlix. In his defense it was an innocent mistake: Virtually identical title, Sci-fi style cover, released in 2011... but oh how much difference one colon can make. I'm not arguing that "Battle: Los Angeles" was a good movie, but while it might have left me somewhat disappointed, "Battle OF Los Angeles" left me thoroughly disgusted and with a bad headache to boot. Most pornos have better acting than this movie, the F-16 fighter jets look like they were borrowed from Microsoft Flight Sim
Action movie of the year! Better than Fast Five!
horrible movie not worth watching, acting was really bad and everything sucked about this movie calling it a B movie would be an insult to B movies
0 stars...
0 Stars. Acting is horrible! Furthermore, the CGI is mickey mouse.... A very bad movie trying to capitalize on a block buster movie. I'm surprised they're not being sued, lol.
it wasn't THAT bad, I enjoyed a lot of the action. If you thought a movie called Battle:LA was going to be a thought-provoking, stunning blockbuster, get your head checked. It's called Battle, and it's about battle. that's it.
actually 0 stars.
really bad, attack of the killer tomatoes was better
Really unsure what people were expecting. Honestly, it deserved about 3.5 stars, just rated it 5 to bring it up a bit because everyone's one star rating is actually unreasonable. Decent movie. Watchable.