Battle of Los Angeles Movie Poster

Battle of Los Angeles

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.36/5

User rating: 2.36

Based on 60 votes and 18 reviews.


  • User rating: 12 24.00%
  • User rating: 4 8.00%
  • User rating: 4 8.00%
  • User rating: 0.00%
  • User rating: 30 60.00%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 1-10 of 18 reviews

User rating: August 11, 2011

I am sci fi fanatic but this rubbish is an insult. It does not deserves a 1 star either. Do no waste your time. Battle: Los Angeles is a different movie. The acting is very poor, I would prefer to watch the old godzilla alike japanese movies from the late 70's that this called "film".

User rating: June 26, 2011

The vast majority of reviewers (over 50%) gave this movie a rating of 1 star and for good reason. I had the misfortune of watching this movie when a buddy of mine thought he found "Battle: Los Angeles" on NetFlix. In his defense it was an innocent mistake: Virtually identical title, Sci-fi style cover, released in 2011... but oh how much difference one colon can make. I'm not arguing that "Battle: Los Angeles" was a good movie, but while it might have left me somewhat disappointed, "Battle OF Los Angeles" left me thoroughly disgusted and with a bad headache to boot. Most pornos have better acting than this movie, the F-16 fighter jets look like they were borrowed from Microsoft Flight Sim

User rating: May 28, 2011

Action movie of the year! Better than Fast Five!

User rating: May 28, 2011

horrible movie not worth watching, acting was really bad and everything sucked about this movie calling it a B movie would be an insult to B movies

User rating: May 16, 2011

0 stars...

User rating: May 15, 2011

0 Stars. Acting is horrible! Furthermore, the CGI is mickey mouse.... A very bad movie trying to capitalize on a block buster movie. I'm surprised they're not being sued, lol.

User rating: April 28, 2011

it wasn't THAT bad, I enjoyed a lot of the action. If you thought a movie called Battle:LA was going to be a thought-provoking, stunning blockbuster, get your head checked. It's called Battle, and it's about battle. that's it.

User rating: April 20, 2011

actually 0 stars.

User rating: April 18, 2011

really bad, attack of the killer tomatoes was better

User rating: April 18, 2011

Really unsure what people were expecting. Honestly, it deserved about 3.5 stars, just rated it 5 to bring it up a bit because everyone's one star rating is actually unreasonable. Decent movie. Watchable.